This site is no longer operational and is not updated.
It is maintained only for archive purposes by the Ministry of Justice.

 

Review of the
Criminal Courts of England and Wales

Appendix 5

BIBLIOGRAPHY FOR research paper WHAT CAN THE ENGLISH LEGAL SYSTEM LEARN FROM RESEARCH PUBLISHED UP TO 2000?

PENNY DARBYSHIRE, ANDY MAUGHAN & ANGUS STEWART

 

Jury Excusal and Deferral: J Airs and A Shaw, Home Office Research and Statistics Directorate Research Study No. 102, 1999

Jury service: a personal observation, Anon., Legal Action Group Bulletin, December 1979, 278, referred to throughout as the LAG psychologist.

Why I despair for British Justice, Anon., Daily Mail, 27th December, 1990

Evidence evaluation in jury decision-making, R Arce, Handbook of Psychology in Legal Contexts (Bull & Carson eds.) 1995

The criminal process — an evaluative study, A Ashworth, (2nd ed.,) Oxford, 1998

Jury trial,s J Baldwin and M McConville, Clarendon Press, 1979

The jury and reality, Z Bankowski,

The Jury Under Attack (Findlay & Duff eds.) 1998

Members of the jury, D Barber and G Gordon, Wildwood House, London 1974

The jury is still out: the role of jury science in the modern American courtroom, J W Barber, J W Barber, 31 Am Crim L Rev 1225, 1994

Miscarriages of justice in potentially capital cases, H A Bedau & M Radelet, 40 Stan. L. Rev. 21, 1987

Twelve men and true! Bah humbug, A Bell, 147 NLJ 1857, 1997

Jury selection and bias: debunking invidious stereotypes through science, M J Bonazzoli, 18 Quinnipiac Law Review 247, 1998

Jury decision making; an empirical study based on actual felony trials, D L Bridgeman and D Marlowe, 64 Journal of Applied Psychology No 2, 91-98, 1979

How to make jury verdicts less hit and miss, P Brock, The Times 23rd April 1980

The University of Chicago jury project, D W Broeder, 38 Nebraska L.R. 744, 1959

Carlton, Darbyshire, Harris, Hodgetts and Robbins, in separate articles 140 N.L.J. 1264-1276, 1990

Making legal language understandable, R Charrow & V Charrow, 79 Colum.L.Rev.1306, 1979

The law of the other, M Constable, University of Chicago Press, 1964

Contempt of Court Act, 1981

The Jury, W. R. Cornish, Allen Lane, 1970

Learning lessons and speaking rights. Creating educated and democratic juries, B M Dann, 68 IndLJ 1229, 1993

The Lamp That Shows That Freedom Lives: Is it Worth the Candle?, P Darbyshire, CrimLR 740, 1991

For the New Lord Chancellor — Some Causes of Concern About Magistrates, P Darbyshire, CrimLR 861, 1997

The Judge, Devlin

Serving as a juryman in Britain, E Devons, 28 MLR 561, 1964

The case for jury waiver, S Doran & J Jackson, Crim LR 155, 1997

The Scottish criminal jury: a very peculiar institution, P Duff, 62 Law & Contemporary Problems 173, 1999

Anyone know what the Judge is on about?, C Dyer, The Guardian 17th July 2000

Hard Cases Make Bad Law, Editorial,142 NLJ 1293, 1992

A jurors tale, R Eldin, 138 NLJ 37, 1998

Some steps between attitudes and verdicts, P C Ellsworth, in R Hastie, ed., Inside the Juror, Cambridge University Press, 1993

Report of the Departmental Committee on jury service, Cmnd 2627, 1965

Making jury instructions understandable, A Elwork, B D Sales and J J Alfini, Charlottesville, VA: Michie, 1982

A ceiling or consistency effect for the comprehension of jury instructions, P W English & B D Sales, 3 Psychol Pub Pol’y & L 381, 1997

Multi racial juries, S Enright, 141 NLJ 992, 1991

Jury research in America, H S Erlanger, 4 Law & Society Review 345, 1970

The juror under attack, M Findlay & P Duff (eds), Butterworths, 1998

Common sense justice: jurors’ notions of the law, N J Finkel, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995

Race and the jury: racial disenfranchisement and the search for justice, H Fukurai, Edward W Butler and Richard Krooth, Plenum Press, 1993

Cross-sectional jury representation or systematic representation? Simple random and Cluster Sampling Strategies in Jury Selection, H Fukurai, E Butler & R Krooth, 19 Journal of Criminal Justice 31-48, 1991

Race, social class and jury participation: new dimensions for evaluating discrimination in jury service and jury selection, H Fukurai, 24 Journal of Criminal Justice No1, 71-88, 1996

The representative jury requirement: jury representatives and cross sectional participation from beginning to the end of the jury selection process, H Fukurai, 23 International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, No1, 55-90, 1999

Social de-construction of race and affirmative action in jury selection, H. Fukurai, 11 La Raza LJ 17, 1999

The myths and realities of attorney jury selection folklore and scientific jury selection: what works?, S M. Fulero and S D Penrod, 17 Ohio NUI Rev 229, 1990

Explaining the verdict, J Gibbons, 147 N.L.J. 1454, 1997

The Juryman’s Tale, T Grove, 1998

Sec. 12 of the Canada Evidence Act and the deliberation of simulated juries, V P Hans & A N Doob, 18 Crim. Law q235, 1976

The Arizona jury reform permitting civil jury trial discussions: The views of trial participants, judges and jurors ,V P Hans, P L Hannaford and G T Munsterman, 32 U Mich. JL Ref 349, 1999

Judging the Jury, V P Hans & N Vidmar, New York: Plenum Press, 1986

Why the middle class is a trial, J Harlow, The Sunday Times, 11th February 1990

Inside the Juror, R Hastie (ed), Cambridge University Press, 1993

Inside the Jury, R Hastie, S D Penrod & N Pennington, Harvard University Press, 1983

Magistrates Court or Crown Court? Mode of trial decisions and sentencing, C Hedderman & D Moxon, Home Office Research Study no125, 1992

Racism, impartiality and juries, P Herbert, 145 New Law Journal 1138, 1995

Instructing jurors: a field experiment with written and preliminary instructions, L Heuer & S D Penrod, Law and Human Behaviour, 13 at 409, 1989

The effect of jury nullification instruction on verdicts and jury functioning in criminal trials, I A Horowitz, 9 Law and Human Behaviour 25, 1985

The value of jury trial, J Jackson, in Criminal Justice (Attwood & Goldberg eds) pp87-93, 1995

Judge without jury: Diplock trials in the adversarial system, J Jackson & S Doran, Oxford, 1995

The Jury System in Contemporary Ireland: In the Shadow of a Troubled Past, J Jackson, K Quinn & T O’Malley, 62 Law & Contemporary Problems 203, 1999

Black innocence and the white jury, S L Johnson, 83 Mich.L.R. 1611, 1985

Judicial Studies Board

Defining the standard of proof in jury instructions, D K Kagehiro, Psychological Science 194, 1990

Jury Representativeness: A Mandate for Multiple Source Lists, D Kairys, J Kadane and J P Lehoczky, 65 California Law Review 776-827, 1977

The American Jury, H Kalven & H Zeisel, Little Brown & Company, Boston, 1966

Reducing the effects of juror bias, M F Kaplan & L E Miller, In The Jury Box (Wrightsman, Kassin and Willis eds) p114

Dirty tricks of cross-examinations, S M Kassin et al,. 14 Law & Hum Behav 373, 1990

Final Report of the Blue Ribbon Commission on Jury System Improvement, J Clark Kelso, 47 Hastings L J 1433, 1996

The Route to Clear Jury Instructions, J Kimble, 78 Michigan Bar Journal 1406, 1999

Postconviction review of jury discrimination: measuring the effects of juror race on juror decisions, NJ King, 92 MichLR 63, 1993

The American criminal jury, N J King, 62 Law & Contemporary Problems 41, 1999

Stratified juror selection: cross section by design, N King and G T Munsterman, 79 Judicature No5, 273, 1996

Deliberating juror pre-deliberation discussions: should California follow the Arizona model?, N K Lakamp, 45 UCLA Law Review 845, 1998

Lawtel

D Leigh and R Lustig, in two articles in The Observer, 23rd August 1981

Telling tales in court: trial procedure and the story model, R Lempert, Cardoza LR vol.13:559, 1991

What social science teaches us about the jury instruction process, J D Lieberman & B D Sales, 3 PsycholPubPol’y & L 589, 1997

The effects on juries of hearing about the defendant’s previous criminal record: a simulation study, S Lloyd-Bostock, Crim LR 734, 2000

Decline of the ‘Little Parliament’: juries and jury reform in England and Wales, S Lloyd-Bostock & C Thomas, 62 Law & Contemporary Problems 7, 1999

The trials of a UK juryman, S Lofthouse, 142 NLJ 561, 1992

Reducing the Trials of Jury Service, Lord Chancellor’s Department, Press Release, 31st August 2000

Jury research in England and the United States, S McCabe, 14 BJ Crim 276, 1974

The Shadow Jury at Work, S McCabe & Robert Purves, Oxford University Penal Research Unit, 1972

R v McCalla, CrimLR 335, 1986

Burdens of proof, degrees of belief, quanta of evidence, or Constitutional guarantees?, C M A McCauliff, 35 Vand.L.Rev 1293, 1982

Criminal justice in crisis, M McConville and L Bridges, Edward Elgar, 1994

The system in black and white: exploring the connections between race, crime and justice, (Markowitz & Jones-Brown, eds) Praeger, 2000

Jury selection in the United States: are there lessons to be learned?, R May, CrimLR 270, 1998

Juror characteristics: to what extent are they related to jury verdicts?, C J Mills and W E Bohannon, 64 Judicature Number 1, June/July 1980, 23-31, 1980

The psychology of jury persuasion, M O Miller & T A Mauet, 22 Am J Trial Advoc. 549, 1999

The criminal standard of proof ,J W Montgomery, 148 NLJ 582, 1998

Scientific juror selection: sex as a moderator of demographic and personality predictors of empanelled felony juror behaviour, Moran and Comfort, 43 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, No5, 1982

The Jury and the Legal System, G Mungham and Z Bankowski, in P Carlen, The Sociology of Law, P Carlen, University of Keele, Staffordshire, 1976

A Brief History of State Jury Reform Efforts, G T Munsterman, 79 Judicature, Number 5, March-April, 1996

The search for jury representativeness, G T Munsterman & J T Munsterman, 11 Justice System Journal (1) 59-78, 1986

Criminal Justice Process, N Padfield, (2nd ed) Butterworths, 1999

A cognitive theory of juror decision making: the story model, N Pennington & R Hastie, Cardoza LR vol 13:519, 1991

Statistics on race and the criminal justice system — the 1995 British Crime Survey, Percy, Home Office Publications, 1998

Reasonable and other doubts: the problem of jury instructions, R C Power, 67 Tenn L R 45, 1999

Practice Note, 3 All ER 240, 1988

Jury deliberations, voting and verdict trends, JP Reed, 45 Social Scene Quarterly 361 370, 1965

Judge and jury: the Crown Court in action, P Robertshaw, Dartmouth Publishing Company, 1995

The Roskill Report, Fraud Trials Committee Report, London, HMSO, 1986

Social psychology in court, Saks and Hastie, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1978

What do jury experiments tell us about how juries (should) make decisions?, M J Saks, 6 S Cal Interdisciplinary LJ 1, 1997

Jurors and their Verdicts, A P Sealy and W R Cornish, 36 Modern Law Review 496, 1973

The vanishing juror: why are there not enough available jurors?, R Seltzer, 20 The Justice System Journal No3 203-218, 1999

Improving the ability of jurors to comprehend and apply criminal jury instructions, L J Severance & E F Loftus, Law & Society Review, 17, 1982

A more active jury: has Arizona set the standard for reform with its new jury rules?, J E Shtabsky, 28 AZSLJ 1009, 1996

The Jury and The Defence of Insanity, R J Simon, Little, Brown and co Boston

The jury system in America: a critical overview, R J Simon (ed), Sage Publications, 1975

Commensurability: understanding jury research and juror information processing, M S Sobus, 65 Def Couns J 408, 1998

Where is justice for the jury?, L Spence, The Times 6th August 1991

Jury instructions: a persistent failure to communicate ,W W Steele & E G Thornbug, 67 NCLRev 77, 1988

The psychology of criminal justice, G M Stephenson, Blackwell-Oxford, 1992

Procedural justice: a psychological analysis, J Thibaut & L Walker, 1975

Jury selection procedures, Van Dyke, Ballinger Publishing Company, 1977

Evidence and outcome: a comparison of contested trials in the magistrates’ courts and the Crown Court, J Vennard, Home Office Research Unit, London, 1986

The use of peremptory challenge and stand by of jurors and their relationship with trial outcome, J Vennard and David Riley, Crim LR 723, 1998

World jury systems, N Vidmar (ed) Oxford, 2000

The Canadian criminal jury, N Vidmar, 62 Law & Contemporary Problems 141, 1999

Juries and expert evidence: social framework testimony, N Vidmar & R A Schuller, 52 Law & Contemp Probs 133, 1989

Juror decision making: the importance of evidence, C A Visher, 11 Law and Human Behaviour, No1, 1-17, 1987

Criminal Justice — Text & Materials, M Wasik & T Gibbons, Addison Wesley Longman, 1998

Westlaw

Beauty and the Beast: physical appearance discrimination in American criminal trials, D L Wiley, 27 St, Mary’s LJ 193, 1995

Jury source representativeness and the use of voter registration list,s C Williams, New York University Law Review, 590, 1990

On the inefficacy of limiting instructions, R Wissler & M Saks, 9 Law & Hum Behav 37, 1986

Criminal trials: curtailing the judge’s summing-up function, D Wolchover, The Law Society Gazette at p363, 5th Feb 1986

Should judges sum up the facts?, D Wolchover, Crim LR 784, 1989

In the jury box, L S Wrightsman, S M Kassin, C E Willis (eds), Sage, 1987

Colour blindness in the jury room, P Wynn Davis, The Independent, 29th June 1990

Juries in criminal trials, W Young, N Cameron and Y Tinsley, New Zealand Law Commission Preliminary Paper no 37, 1999

Cases and materials on the English legal system, M Zander, (8th ed.) Butterworths, 1999

The Royal Commission on Criminal Justice, Research Study no 19: Crown Court Study, M Zander & P Henderson, HMSO, 1993

’Convincing empirical evidence’ on the six member jury, H Zeisel & S Steadman Diamond, 41 University of Chicago Law Review 281, 1974

The effect of peremptory challenges on jury and verdict: an experiment in a Federal District Court, H Zeisel and S Seidman Diamond, 30 Stanford Law Review 491-531, 1978

The jury on trial, H B Zobel, July-Aug. Am Heritage at 42, reported in 105 Yale LJ 2285, 1995

Back to Previous Chapter | Back to Contents |